5 posts about risk-management
I understand avoidance eliminates the risk and mitigation reduces probability/impact. But in practice, how do you decide? If a risk has 80% probability and high impact, is that avoidance or mitigation territory?
My team keeps logging risks that have already happened. Isn't that an issue, not a risk? Where's the line?
PMBOK mentions that risk responses can create secondary risks. Can someone give me a real-world example of this happening? I can't picture it.
Our risk register has 45 risks, last updated 3 months ago. The PM says 'we review risks at milestones.' Is that enough? What does PMBOK recommend?
EMV = Probability x Impact. But in a decision tree with multiple branches, do I add the EMVs together? And are opportunity EMVs positive or negative?